Casting light on why FX White Labelling is a compelling proposition

November 2024 in Brokerage Operations

FX white label trading solutions have evolved rapidly over recent years. While greater choice is clearly welcome, firms need to do their due diligence when assessing the wide variety of options at their disposal.

The FX trading ecosystem offers white label clients a highly adaptable suite of tools that complement the traditional front-end and back-end software offering, such as trading platforms and back office terminals. These tools enable clients to fine-tune trading settings, conduct detailed customer profiling, configure liquidity at granular level and manage trading risk with advanced control options. Furthermore, they allow users to design customised functionalities tailored not only to the client type (for example, brokerage or fund management entity) but also its size and level of sophistication. This comprehensive approach also ensures clients benefit from institutional grade security while accessing a robust, pre-existing trading infrastructure.

“Leveraging an existing infrastructure brings significant benefits in terms of cost saving, speed and scalability,” says Marco Maggioni, sales director Finalto. “By adopting this approach, companies can reduce time-to-market, allowing them to focus on growth and client acquisition rather than technological development. White label providers also offer robust compliance frameworks and security protocols that align with regulatory standards.”

Varied services

FX white label platforms deliver a range of services from liquidity aggregation and order/execution management to risk management and seamless integration with third party systems. Additional features such as regulatory reporting integration and KYC compliance create a robust, end-to-end solution that streamlines operations and maximises market access.

“A recent study of our client base showed that we were able to deliver Grade 1 bank and broker white label technology at about 5-8% of the cost and effort required for in-house builds and in a fraction of the time,” says Vinay Trivedi, COO sell-side solutions at SGX FX.

“By adopting white label solutions, banks and brokers can focus on core strengths like client relationships and trading strategies, leaving the technology development and upkeep to trusted providers.”

Vinay Trivedi

According to Trivedi, institutions turn to white label solutions to sidestep the costs and complexities of building and maintaining their own trading platforms.

“In a competitive landscape where technology rapidly evolves and regulatory demands intensify, the appeal is clear: fast market entry, access to advanced trading tools and deep liquidity – all without the heavy investment in infrastructure,” he says. “By adopting white label solutions, banks and brokers can focus on core strengths like client relationships and trading strategies, leaving the technology development and upkeep to trusted providers.”

The platforms and services available to brokers on a white label basis include everything from robust trading platforms to client relationship management systems, liquidity providers, risk management tools and back office operations. White label solutions also often include integration with payment service providers, reporting tools and customer support systems.

“One of the key advantages of white label solutions is the ability to provide a seamless, end-to-end platform that covers the entire brokerage operation, without requiring the broker to invest heavily in software development,” says Jon Light, head of OTC platform at Devexperts. “This includes trading platforms for different asset classes (FX, CFDs, cryptos, stocks), mobile trading apps, web-based platforms and desktop applications. Brokers can choose customisable front ends, reporting dashboards and branding options, allowing them to maintain their unique identity.”

Customised solution

White label platforms allow brokers to present the platform as their own, complete with custom branding and interface design. This gives brokers full control over their brand image while offering a robust, professional-grade platform in the background. Customers associate the technology and user experience with the broker’s brand rather than that of a third party provider, which helps build trust and loyalty.

“White label providers typically have years of experience in the FX market, having built and refined their platforms over time,” says Light. “Brokers benefit from this accumulated knowledge, accessing a tried-and-tested solution that adheres to best practices in terms of performance, security and compliance. This also means that brokers can rely on ongoing updates and support from teams who are deeply knowledgeable about both the technology and the FX industry.”

In addition, brokers can offer their clients a comprehensive set of trading tools, charting packages, risk management systems and multi-asset trading capabilities. These platforms often include mobile apps, web platforms and advanced analytics – all of which have been optimised and improved based on user feedback and years of operation.

“The demands of modern brokerage operations are immense, requiring not only a feature-rich platform but also the infrastructure to handle complex regulatory requirements, security protocols and rapid market shifts,” observes Light. “Developing and maintaining such a platform in-house can be cost-prohibitive and operationally risky, especially for firms whose core focus is client acquisition and market operations.”

Balancing the desire for a fully customised platform with cost considerations requires a clear understanding of a firm’s long-term strategic goals

Technology shortcut

White label solutions provide a shortcut to cutting-edge technology on platforms that have already been tested, refined and proven effective. This gives brokers the immediate ability to meet the high expectations of clients who demand speed, reliability and advanced trading features.

Choosing the right provider requires careful consideration of several key factors says Trivedi.

“Firms should assess the provider’s track record, service coverage, data centre presence and technology stack, particularly in terms of scalability, performance and customisation. Access to liquidity, regulatory support and seamless integration with existing systems are essential.”

Long-term technical support, regular platform upgrades and innovative features (such as AI-driven trade analytics and machine learning tools) can make a provider more appealing, while reputation and flexible commercial terms are also crucial for a strong partnership.

Balancing the desire for a fully customised platform with cost considerations requires a clear understanding of a firm’s long-term strategic goals. Customisation can provide a competitive edge but often comes with significant upfront implementation costs and ongoing maintenance expenses. “Firms must conduct a thorough cost-benefit analysis, weighing the value of personalisation against operational efficiencies,” says Trivedi. “It is crucial to assess whether customisation enhances client acquisition, retention or trading performance and aligns with growth objectives.”

A stable, ongoing partnership ensures access to regular technology upgrades, regulatory compliance and enhanced service reliability. These collaborations often lead to more favourable commercial terms and pricing, delivering long-term cost efficiency.

“Many of our clients have been with us for over 10 years and these partnerships have proven mutually beneficial,” adds Trivedi. “As we have advanced our product capabilities, our clients have enjoyed continuous innovation at a low cost, enabling them to differentiate themselves in the market with cutting-edge, ahead-of-the-curve product modules and features.”

A primary driver for choosing a white label provider should be the feature richness of the product, as these elements significantly elevate user experience, trading capabilities and operational efficiency. 

“Firms must look beyond surface level offerings like branded client portals or generic products. Instead, the focus should be on selecting providers who offer a customisable, flexible solution that aligns with client-specific needs.”

Marco Maggioni

Supportive approach

However, a common challenge brokerages face is the skills gap in assessing complex, integrated technology solutions. This underscores the need for vendors to provide comprehensive support, helping clients understand the intricacies of the product and pinpoint the technical requirements with the most substantial, long-term impact. 

“While it is hard to argue against a proposition that minimises client costs, firms must look beyond surface level offerings like branded client portals or generic products,” says Maggioni. “Instead, the focus should be on selecting providers who offer a customisable, flexible solution that aligns with client-specific needs. Solutions should empower clients with discretionary permissions to adjust models and protocols and generally give them greater control over their technology stack.”

Developing bespoke solutions can be costly and time intensive. Consequently, it is crucial for clients to take a strategic approach to maximise the value of customisation, prioritising advanced, agile and scalable solutions.

“To do so, it is vital to be able to fully leverage the specialised expertise and technology of white label providers that can enhance their competitive position in the marketplace, meet their customer-specific demands more effectively and foster stronger brand loyalty,” suggests Maggioni. “Additionally, a white label provider’s commitment to ongoing support, regular system updates, gradual technical upgrades and scalability allows clients to adjust resources as their business needs evolve, optimising operational costs over time.”

When choosing a provider it is important that it has similar operating styles and strategic goals to the client. The provider must be responsive to the client’s needs, while the client should utilise the technology in ways that enhance its functionality and efficiency.

“From a technical perspective, software built on a flexible and scalable architecture is ideal for clients aiming for a long-term partnership with a trusted technology partner,” adds Maggioni. “This adaptability ensures continuity, as scalable solutions can seamlessly evolve with shifting market demands, allowing clients to maintain consistent operations and remain competitive.”

When choosing a provider it is important that it has similar operating styles and strategic goals to 

Scalability essential

As brokers expand their client base or add new asset classes, they need a solution that can support increased trading volume and complexity. They should therefore look for platforms that provide comprehensive APIs and integration capabilities with third party services such as liquidity providers, CRM systems and payment gateways.

“It is also important to choose a platform that offers a high degree of customisation,” says Light. “Enterprise-level white label solutions often provide advanced customisability, allowing brokers to tailor the platform’s interface, tools and workflows to suit their unique business model. The ability to tweak the platform to fit both current and future operational needs can be a competitive advantage.”

He recommends brokers be cautious of being locked into a single vendor for all services as they may want to integrate with new technology or liquidity providers that fall outside their vendor’s ecosystem.

“By forming a long-term relationship, brokers gain a trusted advisor who can help them anticipate and respond to market shifts,” adds Light, “This could include insights into regulatory changes, shifts in client trading behaviour or the adoption of new asset classes.”

As the FX landscape evolves, Trivedi anticipates that white label platforms will incorporate cutting-edge technologies such as AI for enhanced trading insights, blockchain for greater transparency and advanced risk and order management tools powered by both third party and in-house algorithms.

“With the increasing sophistication of end clients, firms must offer trusted, fail-proof solutions backed by the branding of reputable institutions,” he says. “These solutions – widely tested by industry leaders and institutions – have proven their robustness and reliability over time, giving firms the confidence to leverage them for success.”

Trivedi expects the future of white label solutions to combine private cloud infrastructure for high performance, low latency trading with public cloud solutions for seamless distribution and scalability.

“Brokers want the flexibility to offer unique products and services to their clients and as such, white label solutions are expected to offer more modular components – allowing brokers to pick and choose features and tools that best suit their business.”

Jon Light

Strategic pathway

According to Maggioni, in the FX brokerage industry white label solutions present a strategic pathway for businesses aiming to expand their offerings quickly and cost effectively. With compliance and security embedded as foundational elements, white label solutions reduce regulatory burdens – a particularly crucial benefit given the industry’s complex regulatory environment.

“White label providers not only ensure their frameworks meet existing standards but also proactively adapt to regulatory changes, helping clients stay compliant without diverting significant internal resources,” he says. “This emphasis on compliance and governance appeals to both start-ups and more established firms, aligning clients with their operational and regulatory needs in diverse regions.”

Moreover, as previously highlighted, scalability and customisation will drive the future success of white label offerings. For financial institutions prioritising cost efficiency, rapid time-to-market and regulatory ease, white label solutions offer a streamlined and sustainable approach to growth in the FX space.

The cost of developing a trading platform comparable to leading solutions on the market is immense, often running into millions of dollars. Aside from the initial build cost there are ongoing costs related to maintenance, updates and scaling the platform to handle growing client demand.

By sharing infrastructure costs across multiple brokers, white label providers can offer a cost-effective solution that lowers the financial barrier to entry.

“As the FX market continues to evolve, white labelling will likely advance in several key ways,” says Light. “One of the most significant trends is the increasing demand for modularity and customisation. Brokers want the flexibility to offer unique products and services to their clients and as such, white label solutions are expected to offer more modular components – allowing brokers to pick and choose features and tools that best suit their business.”